State ex rel. Peterson v. Allen Circuit Court
161 N.E.2d 772, 240 Ind. 694, 1959 Ind. LEXIS 279
Opinion
The petitioner asks a writ of mandate against the respondent court and judge.
The petition does not comply with Rule 2-35 of this court which requires certified copies of the proceedings upon which [695] petition is based, to be filed with the petition in order that this court have proper proof of the allegations made in the petition.
For the reasons stated, the petition is denied.
Note. — -Reported in 161 N. E. 2d 772.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State ex rel. Peterson v. Allen Circuit Court, 161 N.E.2d 772, 240 Ind. 694, 1959 Ind. LEXIS 279 (Ind. 1959).
161 N.E.2d 772 (State ex rel. Peterson v. Allen Circuit Court) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Randolph v. SANDERS, ADMX. ETC.
161 N.E.2d 772 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1959)