State ex rel. Peters v. Industrial Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

State ex rel. Peters v. Industrial Commission

103 Ohio St. 3d 472

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedNovember 10, 2004

DocketNo. 2003-2081

StatusPublished

This text of 103 Ohio St. 3d 472 (State ex rel. Peters v. Industrial Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Peters v. Industrial Commission, 103 Ohio St. 3d 472 (Ohio 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals.

Moyer, C.J., Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor and O’Donnell, JJ., concur. Law Offices of Thomas Tootle Co., L.P.A., and Thomas Tootle, for appellant. Jim Petro, Attorney General, and Keith Blosser, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee Industrial Commission of Ohio. Thompson Hiñe, L.L.P., and Philip B. Cochran, for appellee Sugar Creek Packing Company. Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., dissent and would reverse the judgment of the court of appeals.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals.

Moyer, C.J., Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor and O’Donnell, JJ., concur. Law Offices of Thomas Tootle Co., L.P.A., and Thomas Tootle, for appellant. Jim Petro, Attorney General, and Keith Blosser, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee Industrial Commission of Ohio. Thompson Hiñe, L.L.P., and Philip B. Cochran, for appellee Sugar Creek Packing Company. Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., dissent and would reverse the judgment of the court of appeals.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

103 Ohio St. 3d 472, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-peters-v-industrial-commission-ohio-2004.