State ex rel. Pepple v. Montgomery
767 N.E.2d 272, 95 Ohio St. 3d 1440, 2002 Ohio LEXIS 1040
This text of 767 N.E.2d 272 (State ex rel. Pepple v. Montgomery) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
State ex rel. Pepple v. Montgomery, 767 N.E.2d 272, 95 Ohio St. 3d 1440, 2002 Ohio LEXIS 1040 (Ohio 2002).
Opinion
In Mandamus and Prohibition. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for writs of mandamus and prohibition. Upon consideration of respondents’ motion for stay of discovery pending ruling on motion to dismiss,
IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion for stay of discovery be, and hereby is, granted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Adlaka v. Giannini, Unpublished Decision (9-1-2006)
2006 Ohio 4611 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2006)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
767 N.E.2d 272, 95 Ohio St. 3d 1440, 2002 Ohio LEXIS 1040, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-pepple-v-montgomery-ohio-2002.