State ex rel. Pendleton v. Shea

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State ex rel. Pendleton v. Shea

513 So. 2d 1196, 1987 La. LEXIS 10414

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedOctober 22, 1987

DocketNo. 87-KH-2217

StatusPublished

This text of 513 So. 2d 1196 (State ex rel. Pendleton v. Shea) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Pendleton v. Shea, 513 So. 2d 1196, 1987 La. LEXIS 10414 (La. 1987).

Pincite

Opinion

In re Pendleton, Darryl; applying for writ of mandamus, supervisory and/or remedial writs; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. KW-8669; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “G”, No. 281-945.

The relator represents that the district court has failed to act timely on a motion he has filed for production of documents. If relator’s representation is correct, the district court is ordered to consider and act on the motion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Pendleton, Darryl; applying for writ of mandamus, supervisory and/or remedial writs; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. KW-8669; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “G”, No. 281-945.

The relator represents that the district court has failed to act timely on a motion he has filed for production of documents. If relator’s representation is correct, the district court is ordered to consider and act on the motion.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

513 So. 2d 1196, 1987 La. LEXIS 10414, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-pendleton-v-shea-la-1987.