State ex rel. Peirce v. Board of Elections
This text of 168 Ohio St. (N.S.) 249 (State ex rel. Peirce v. Board of Elections) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
The petition in this case was not filed until August 23, 1958, eight days after the final date on which candidates could voluntarily withdraw, which was August 15, 1958, i. e., “prior to the eightieth day before the day of such general election” (Section 3513.30, Revised Code) and three days after the time during which vacancies could be filled, which was August 20, or “not later than the seventy-sixth day before the day of such general election” (Section 3513.31, Revised Code).
Under such circumstances, the unexplained dilatoriness on the part of relator, where time was an important factor and required his diligence, deprives him of the relief he now seeks. In the event the election result is favorable to Flex, other remedies will be available to relator.
The demurrers to the petition are sustained, and the writ of prohibition is denied. State, ex rel. Winterfeld, v. Board of Elections of Lucas County, 167 Ohio St., 531, 150 N. E. (2d), 420.
Writ denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
168 Ohio St. (N.S.) 249, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-peirce-v-board-of-elections-ohio-1958.