State ex rel. Peck v. Indus. Comm.

2000 Ohio 308, 88 Ohio St. 3d 228
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided March 21, 2000·No. 1999-1024·Published

Opinion

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 88 Ohio St.3d 228.]

THE STATE EX REL. PECK, APPELLEE, v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF OHIO, APPELLANT, ET AL. [Cite as State ex rel. Peck v. Indus. Comm., 2000-Ohio-308.] Workers’ compensation–Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed. (No. 99-1024—Submitted February 8, 2000—Decided March 22, 2000.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 98AP-446. __________________ Philip J. Fulton & Associates and William A. Thorman III, for appellee. Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and Thomas W. Atzberger, Assistant Attorney General, for appellant. __________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals. MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. COOK, J., dissents. __________________

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. Peck v. Indus. Comm., 2000 Ohio 308, 88 Ohio St. 3d 228 (Ohio 2000).

2000 Ohio 308 (State ex rel. Peck v. Indus. Comm.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.