State ex rel. Peak v. Nichols

136 N.E.2d 616, 235 Ind. 610, 1956 Ind. LEXIS 200
CourtIndiana Supreme Court
DecidedSeptember 5, 1956
DocketNo. 29,446
StatusPublished

This text of 136 N.E.2d 616 (State ex rel. Peak v. Nichols) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State ex rel. Peak v. Nichols, 136 N.E.2d 616, 235 Ind. 610, 1956 Ind. LEXIS 200 (Ind. 1956).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This is an original action in which petitioner has filed in this court “Complaint to Compel Judge to Rule on Motion for New Trial,” and asks that [611]*611a writ of mandate issue out of this court directed to respondent court.

Petitioner has not complied with Rule 2-35 of this court requiring petitions for writs of mandate to be filed in sextuplícate, nor has he provided this court with certified copies of the pleadings, orders and entries pertaining to the subject matter as required by such rule when the relief sought pertains to a proceeding in an inferior court.

The writ of mandate is denied.

Note. — Reported in 136 N. E. 2d 616.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
136 N.E.2d 616, 235 Ind. 610, 1956 Ind. LEXIS 200, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-peak-v-nichols-ind-1956.