State ex rel. Payne v. State

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State ex rel. Payne v. State

661 So. 2d 1371, 1995 La. LEXIS 2679, 1995 WL 649030

Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided November 3, 1995·No. No. 95-KH-2138·Published

Opinion

In re: Payne, Leroy; — Plaintiffs); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of East Baton Rouge, 19th Judicial District Court, Div. “G”, No. 9-72-807.

Relator represents that the district court has failed to act timely on a motion to correct an illegal sentence he filed on or about February 10,1995. If relator’s representation is correct, the district court is ordered to consider and act on the motion. If relator’s representation is incorrect, the district court is ordered to accept, file, and act upon the pleading which is herewith transferred to the district court. The district court is ordered to provide this Court with a copy of its judgment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re: Payne, Leroy; — Plaintiffs); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of East Baton Rouge, 19th Judicial District Court, Div. “G”, No. 9-72-807.

Relator represents that the district court has failed to act timely on a motion to correct an illegal sentence he filed on or about February 10,1995. If relator’s representation is correct, the district court is ordered to consider and act on the motion. If relator’s representation is incorrect, the district court is ordered to accept, file, and act upon the pleading which is herewith transferred to the district court. The district court is ordered to provide this Court with a copy of its judgment.

State ex rel. Payne v. State, 661 So. 2d 1371, 1995 La. LEXIS 2679, 1995 WL 649030 (La. 1995).

Pincite

661 So. 2d 1371 (State ex rel. Payne v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.