Home/Ohio Supreme Court/State ex rel. Patton v. Bazzell

State ex rel. Patton v. Bazzell

161 Ohio St. (N.S.) 344
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedApril 23, 1954
DocketNo. 33946
StatusPublished

This text of 161 Ohio St. (N.S.) 344 (State ex rel. Patton v. Bazzell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State ex rel. Patton v. Bazzell, 161 Ohio St. (N.S.) 344 (Ohio 1954).

Opinions

Per Curiam.

This court is of the opinion that the board of elections in declaring the petition valid did not abuse its discretion. Accordingly, the Court of [346]*346Appeals was not in error in sustaining the demurrer to the amended petition, and its judgment is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Weygandt, C. J., Middleton, Taet, Hart, Zimmerman, Stewart and Lamneck, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State Ex Rel. Kroeger v. Leonard
84 N.E.2d 910 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1949)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
161 Ohio St. (N.S.) 344, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-patton-v-bazzell-ohio-1954.