State Ex Rel. Patterson v. Miami Circuit Court
This text of 81 N.E.2d 536 (State Ex Rel. Patterson v. Miami Circuit Court) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The petitioner seeks ah alternate writ of mandate to compel the respondent to hear an al leged petition for writ of error coram nobis filed in said court. Under the authority of Lester v. Grant Circuit Court (1948), ante, p. 186, 78 N. E. 2d 785, and the authorities therein cited, the petition is insufficient for two reasons. There is *396 no allegation that the petitioner ever served a copy of his petition for writ of error coram nobis upon the Attorney General aá required by § 49-1937 Burns’ 1933 (Supp.) (Acts 1945, ch. 3, § 1, p. 7, Acts 1947, ch. 196, §1, p. 638), and until such service has been made he has no cause of action commenced in the Miami Circuit Court. Nor does the petition contain or have attached as exhibits “certified copies of all pleadings, orders and entries pertaining to the subject matter” in the respondent circuit court as required by Rule 2-35 of this court.
The petition is denied.
Note.—Reported in 81 N. E. 2d 536.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
81 N.E.2d 536, 226 Ind. 395, 1948 Ind. LEXIS 180, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-patterson-v-miami-circuit-court-ind-1948.