State ex rel Parrott v. Evans

12 S.E. 816, 33 S.C. 612, 1891 S.C. LEXIS 11
CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina
DecidedJanuary 28, 1891
DocketNo. 2738
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 12 S.E. 816 (State ex rel Parrott v. Evans) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State ex rel Parrott v. Evans, 12 S.E. 816, 33 S.C. 612, 1891 S.C. LEXIS 11 (S.C. 1891).

Opinion

This case is sufficiently stated in the following decision, rendered January 28, 1891:

Per Curiam.

The relator, upon a proceeding in the nature of quo warranto, moved the court to issue a rule to show cause against the defendant, the object of the proceeding being to try the question of the title to the office of school commissioner, held by the defendant and claimed by the relator. This court holds that under the law they do not consider the court authorized to issue a rule to show cause in a case like this. Under the code, the proceeding should be in the nature of an action, and all actions are commenced by complaint, to which the defendant is entitled to file an answer.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kosman v. Thompson
215 N.W. 261 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1927)
State Ex Rel. Lindsey v. Tollison
78 S.E. 521 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1913)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
12 S.E. 816, 33 S.C. 612, 1891 S.C. LEXIS 11, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-parrott-v-evans-sc-1891.