State Ex Rel. Parradee v. Overstreet

Supreme Court of Florida

State Ex Rel. Parradee v. Overstreet

174 So. 399, 128 Fla. 230, 1937 Fla. LEXIS 1241

DecidedMay 19, 1937

StatusPublished

This text of 174 So. 399 (State Ex Rel. Parradee v. Overstreet) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State Ex Rel. Parradee v. Overstreet, 174 So. 399, 128 Fla. 230, 1937 Fla. LEXIS 1241 (Fla. 1937).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This cause coming on to be heard upon petition for Alternative Writ of Mandamus to require the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Osceola County to issue writ of error as of July 12, 1935, in the case of W. J. Steed v. Edward Parradee and to require the Judge of the Circuit Court to sign and settle the bill of exceptions in said cause as of the last mentioned date, and it appearing from the *231 opinion of this court filed in said cause April 22, 1937, and the record herein that the time allowed under the law for taking writs of error in such causes has long since lapsed and had lapsed at the time the petition for mandamus herein was filed.

It is therefore ordered, adjudged and decreed that the petition for alternative writ of mandamus be and the same is hereby denied.

Ellis, C. J., and Terrell, Brown, Buford and Davis, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This cause coming on to be heard upon petition for Alternative Writ of Mandamus to require the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Osceola County to issue writ of error as of July 12, 1935, in the case of W. J. Steed v. Edward Parradee and to require the Judge of the Circuit Court to sign and settle the bill of exceptions in said cause as of the last mentioned date, and it appearing from the *231 opinion of this court filed in said cause April 22, 1937, and the record herein that the time allowed under the law for taking writs of error in such causes has long since lapsed and had lapsed at the time the petition for mandamus herein was filed.

It is therefore ordered, adjudged and decreed that the petition for alternative writ of mandamus be and the same is hereby denied.

Ellis, C. J., and Terrell, Brown, Buford and Davis, J. J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

174 So. 399, 128 Fla. 230, 1937 Fla. LEXIS 1241, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-parradee-v-overstreet-fla-1937.