State Ex Rel. Parks v. Seagraves

166 S.E. 747, 203 N.C. 647, 1932 N.C. LEXIS 61
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided December 7, 1932·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Stacy, C. J.

The record recites “judgment signed,” but we are not advised as to its contents. The proceeding was denominated a criminal action in the justice’s court, and a civil action in the Superior Court. In the absence of the judgment, we cannot know whether it purports to be one rendered in a civil action or in a criminal prosecution.

Rule 19, sec. 1, provides that “the pleadings on which the case is tried, the issues, and the judgment appealed from shall be a part of the transcript in all cases.” The judgment of the Superior Court is not in the record. Everett v. Fair Association, 202 N. C., 838, 162 S. E., 896. It is the uniform practice to dismiss the appeal for failure to send up necessary parts of the record proper. Riggan v. Harrison, ante, 191; Pruitt v. Wood, 199 N. C., 788, 156 S. E., 126. It is the duty of appellant to see that the record is properly made up and transmitted. S. v. Frizell, 111 N. C., 722, 16 S. E., 409.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State Ex Rel. Parks v. Seagraves, 166 S.E. 747, 203 N.C. 647, 1932 N.C. LEXIS 61 (N.C. 1932).

166 S.E. 747 (State Ex Rel. Parks v. Seagraves) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Thrush v. Thrush
94 S.E.2d 897 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1956)
Ericson v. . Ericson
38 S.E.2d 517 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1946)
State v. Ravensford Lumber Co.
175 S.E. 713 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1934)
Payne v. . Brown
172 S.E. 348 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1934)
Powell v. . Moore
169 S.E. 281 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1933)