State Ex Rel. Parks v. Seagraves
This text of 166 S.E. 747 (State Ex Rel. Parks v. Seagraves) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The record recites “judgment signed,” but we are not advised as to its contents. The proceeding was denominated a criminal action in the justice’s court, and a civil action in the Superior Court. In the absence of the judgment, we cannot know whether it purports to be one rendered in a civil action or in a criminal prosecution.
Rule 19, sec. 1, provides that “the pleadings on which the case is tried, the issues, and the judgment appealed from shall be a part of the transcript in all cases.” The judgment of the Superior Court is not in the record. Everett v. Fair Association, 202 N. C., 838, 162 S. E., 896. It is the uniform practice to dismiss the appeal for failure to send up necessary parts of the record proper. Riggan v. Harrison, ante, 191; Pruitt v. Wood, 199 N. C., 788, 156 S. E., 126. It is the duty of appellant to see that the record is properly made up and transmitted. S. v. Frizell, 111 N. C., 722, 16 S. E., 409.
Appeal dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
166 S.E. 747, 203 N.C. 647, 1932 N.C. LEXIS 61, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-parks-v-seagraves-nc-1932.