State ex rel. Parker v. Russo

2012 Ohio 541, 131 Ohio St. 3d 175
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided February 15, 2012·No. 2011-1114·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

{¶ 1} We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals denying the request of appellant, Michael Parker Jr., for a writ of mandamus to compel appellee, Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas Judge John Russo, to issue findings of fact and conclusions of law for the denial of Parker’s petition for postconviction relief. Judge Russo’s entry denied Parker’s petition because his “claims are barred under the doctrine of res judicata, which claims could have or have been raised on direct appeal.” The entry contained sufficient findings and conclusions to apprise Parker of the grounds for the judgment and to allow appellate courts to properly determine any appeal therefrom. State ex rel. Carrion v. Harris, 40 Ohio St.3d 19, 19-20, 530 N.E.2d 1330 (1988); Gause v. Zaleski, 85 Ohio St.3d 614, 615, 710 N.E.2d 684 (1999).

Judgment affirmed.

O’Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, Cupp, and McGee Brown, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. Parker v. Russo, 2012 Ohio 541, 131 Ohio St. 3d 175 (Ohio 2012).

2012 Ohio 541 (State ex rel. Parker v. Russo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Knowlton
2024 Ohio 5869 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2024)
State v. Hill
2020 Ohio 3824 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2020)
State v. Gomez
2020 Ohio 835 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2020)