State ex rel. Parker v. Board of County Commissioners

83 N.W. 70, 60 Neb. 275, 1900 Neb. LEXIS 143
CourtNebraska Supreme Court
DecidedJune 7, 1900
DocketNo. 11,287
StatusPublished

This text of 83 N.W. 70 (State ex rel. Parker v. Board of County Commissioners) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nebraska Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State ex rel. Parker v. Board of County Commissioners, 83 N.W. 70, 60 Neb. 275, 1900 Neb. LEXIS 143 (Neb. 1900).

Opinion

Norvad, O. J.

This was an application for a writ of mandamus to compel the respondent, the board of county commissioners of Saline county, to approve the bond of relator as county attorney of said county. It appears that at the general election held in said county in November, 1898, one A. W. Martin was duly elected county attorney for the term of two years beginning in January following; that he qualified and entered upon the discharge of the duties of his office; that in August, 1899, said Martin died and Hon. W. H. Morris was appointed by the county board to fill the vacancy; that, in December, 1899, said Morris resigned his office and removed from the state; that at the general election in November, 1899, the name of the relator, Thomas B.' Parker, was written upon the official ballots, and votes were cast for him for the office of county attorney, and he received a majority of all the votes cast at said election for that position and to him [276]*276was awarded a certificate of election. The sole question presented by this record is whether a vacancy occurring in the office of county attorney must be filled by election or by appointment by the county board. We passed upon the same proposition in State v. Rankin, 33 Nebr., 266, adversely to the contention of the present relator. But that decision is directly attacked, and the doctrine there enunciated is assailed as unsound. We have carefully examined the grounds of that decision, in the light of the criticism made thereon, in the brief of relator, and we are all of the opinion that State v. Rankin was correctly decided, and that it controls the decision herein. The judgment is accordingly

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
83 N.W. 70, 60 Neb. 275, 1900 Neb. LEXIS 143, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-parker-v-board-of-county-commissioners-neb-1900.