State ex rel. Paneto v. Matos

944 N.E.2d 690, 128 Ohio St. 3d 1439
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided April 4, 2011·No. 2009-1869·Published

Opinion

Franklin App. No. 08AP-926, 2009-Ohio-4845. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County.

Upon consideration of appellee’s motion to supplement the record with new evidence, it is ordered by the court that the motion is granted, and the record in this ease is hereby supplemented with Exhibit B of the motion to supplement.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. Paneto v. Matos, 944 N.E.2d 690, 128 Ohio St. 3d 1439 (Ohio 2011).

944 N.E.2d 690 (State ex rel. Paneto v. Matos) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.