State ex rel. Palmer v. State
219 So. 3d 325, 2017 La. LEXIS 1032
Opinion
| iDenied. The application was not timely filed in the district court, and relator fails to carry his burden to show that an exception applies. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8; State ex rel. Glover v. State, 93-2330 (La. 9/5/95), 660 So.2d 1189. The application is also repetitive. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4.
Moreover, relator has previously exhausted his right to state collateral review. See State ex rel. Palmer v. State, 15-1029 (La. 3/4/16), 186 So.3d 1150.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State ex rel. Palmer v. State, 219 So. 3d 325, 2017 La. LEXIS 1032 (La. 2017).
219 So. 3d 325 (State ex rel. Palmer v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State Ex Rel. Glover v. State
660 So. 2d 1189 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1995)
State ex rel. Palmer v. State
186 So. 3d 1150 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 2016)