State ex rel. Palmer v. State

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State ex rel. Palmer v. State

219 So. 3d 325, 2017 La. LEXIS 1032

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedMay 12, 2017

DocketNo. 2016-KH-0040

StatusPublished

This text of 219 So. 3d 325 (State ex rel. Palmer v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Palmer v. State, 219 So. 3d 325, 2017 La. LEXIS 1032 (La. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

| iDenied. The application was not timely filed in the district court, and relator fails to carry his burden to show that an exception applies. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8; State ex rel. Glover v. State, 93-2330 (La. 9/5/95), 660 So.2d 1189. The application is also repetitive. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4.

Moreover, relator has previously exhausted his right to state collateral review. See State ex rel. Palmer v. State, 15-1029 (La. 3/4/16), 186 So.3d 1150.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

| iDenied. The application was not timely filed in the district court, and relator fails to carry his burden to show that an exception applies. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8; State ex rel. Glover v. State, 93-2330 (La. 9/5/95), 660 So.2d 1189. The application is also repetitive. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4.

Moreover, relator has previously exhausted his right to state collateral review. See State ex rel. Palmer v. State, 15-1029 (La. 3/4/16), 186 So.3d 1150.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

219 So. 3d 325, 2017 La. LEXIS 1032, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-palmer-v-state-la-2017.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack