State Ex Rel. Paiker v. Coleman

3 So. 2d 733, 148 Fla. 86, 1941 Fla. LEXIS 838
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided September 5, 1941·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Terrell, J.

On a rule nisi in contempt, Relator was committed to the Sheriff of Dade County for failure to pay certain costs in the nature of an attorney’s fee awarded against him. In habeas corpus, he charges that the judgment committing him to the Sheriff is void and non enforceable for indefiniteness as to term.

The judgment has been examined and the assault on it found to be well predicated. The petitioner is accordingly discharged an authority of State, ex rel., Bearden v. Pearson, 132 Fla. 878, 182 So. 233, but without prejudice to the Circuit Court to enter a judgment in compliance with law.

It is so ordered.

Whitfield, acting C. J., Chapman and Thomas, J. J., concurring. Brown, C. J., absent, not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State Ex Rel. Paiker v. Coleman, 3 So. 2d 733, 148 Fla. 86, 1941 Fla. LEXIS 838 (Fla. 1941).

3 So. 2d 733 (State Ex Rel. Paiker v. Coleman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related