State ex rel. P.A.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

State ex rel. P.A.

68 So. 3d 55, 2011 La. App. LEXIS 1795, 2011 WL 2135508

Louisiana Court of Appeal·Decided June 1, 2011·No. Nos. 11-55·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

AMY, Judge.

|¶ For the reasons expressed in the companion case of State of Louisiana in the Interest of C.M., 11-54 (La.App. 3 Cir. 06/01/11), 68 So.3d 47, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed. All costs of this appeal are assessed to the appellant, N.M.M.

AFFIRMED.

SAUNDERS, Judge, dissents and assigns written reasons.

The record, as I read it, does not support the conclusion that there is no reasonable expectation of significant improvement in the mother’s condition or conduct. Accordingly, I do not believe that the State has met its burden of proof, and I respectfully dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

AMY, Judge.

|¶ For the reasons expressed in the companion case of State of Louisiana in the Interest of C.M., 11-54 (La.App. 3 Cir. 06/01/11), 68 So.3d 47, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed. All costs of this appeal are assessed to the appellant, N.M.M.

AFFIRMED.

SAUNDERS, Judge, dissents and assigns written reasons.

The record, as I read it, does not support the conclusion that there is no reasonable expectation of significant improvement in the mother’s condition or conduct. Accordingly, I do not believe that the State has met its burden of proof, and I respectfully dissent.

State ex rel. P.A., 68 So. 3d 55, 2011 La. App. LEXIS 1795, 2011 WL 2135508 (La. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

68 So. 3d 55 (State ex rel. P.A.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related