State ex rel. Otten v. Wyler
882 N.E.2d 921, 117 Ohio St. 3d 1432
Opinion
In Procedendo. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of procedendo. It appears from the records of this court that relator has not filed a brief, due March 14, 2008, in compliance with the Rules of Practice of the Supreme Court and therefore has failed to prosecute this cause with the requisite diligence. Accordingly, pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. X(12),
It is ordered by the court that this cause is dismissed sua sponte.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State ex rel. Otten v. Wyler, 882 N.E.2d 921, 117 Ohio St. 3d 1432 (Ohio 2008).
882 N.E.2d 921 (State ex rel. Otten v. Wyler) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.