State Ex Rel. Ott v. Braddock
197 A. 271, 119 N.J.L. 507, 1938 N.J. LEXIS 322
Opinion
The judgments are affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Ackerson.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Parker, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Perskib, Dear, Wells, WolesEeil, Raeeerty, JJ. 13.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State Ex Rel. Ott v. Braddock, 197 A. 271, 119 N.J.L. 507, 1938 N.J. LEXIS 322 (N.J. 1938).
197 A. 271 (State Ex Rel. Ott v. Braddock) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Horsnall v. Washington Tp.
964 A.2d 341 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2009)
State v. Malik
839 A.2d 67 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2003)
BTD-1996, NPC 1 L.L.C. v. 350 Warren L.P.
755 A.2d 1236 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2000)
In Re Lewkowitz
220 P.2d 229 (Arizona Supreme Court, 1950)
In Re Egge
54 A.2d 240 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1947)
O'Keefe v. Board of Trustees of the State Employees' Retirement System
37 A.2d 292 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1944)
Schulz v. State Board of Education
36 A.2d 907 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1944)
City of Hoboken v. Kelly
32 A.2d 710 (New Jersey Tax Court, 1943)
Joyce v. Price
8 A.2d 226 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1939)
Saslow v. Previti
3 A.2d 811 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1939)