State Ex Rel. Osborne v. Williams

Ohio Supreme Court

State Ex Rel. Osborne v. Williams

145 N.E. 542, 111 Ohio St. 400, 111 Ohio St. (N.S.) 400, 1924 Ohio LEXIS 262

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedDecember 2, 1924

Docket18788

StatusPublished

This text of 145 N.E. 542 (State Ex Rel. Osborne v. Williams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State Ex Rel. Osborne v. Williams, 145 N.E. 542, 111 Ohio St. 400, 111 Ohio St. (N.S.) 400, 1924 Ohio LEXIS 262 (Ohio 1924).

Pincite

Opinions

By the Court.

This cause coining on to be heard upon the pleadings and the admitted facts, the court finds upon the issues for the defendant upon the authority of the case of Berry v. City of Columbus, 104 Ohio St., 607, 136 N. E., 824, and finds that the relator is not entitled to a writ of mandamus against defendant.

Writ denied.

Marshall, O. J., Robinson, Jones, Matthias, Day, Allen, and Conn, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By the Court.

This cause coining on to be heard upon the pleadings and the admitted facts, the court finds upon the issues for the defendant upon the authority of the case of Berry v. City of Columbus, 104 Ohio St., 607, 136 N. E., 824, and finds that the relator is not entitled to a writ of mandamus against defendant.

Writ denied.

Marshall, O. J., Robinson, Jones, Matthias, Day, Allen, and Conn, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

145 N.E. 542, 111 Ohio St. 400, 111 Ohio St. (N.S.) 400, 1924 Ohio LEXIS 262, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-osborne-v-williams-ohio-1924.