State ex rel. Orr v. Bova
This text of 2014 Ohio 1525 (State ex rel. Orr v. Bova) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[Cite as State ex rel. Orr v. Bova, 2014-Ohio-1525.]
Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA
JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 101036
STATE OF OHIO, EX REL. DARLLEL B. ORR
PETITIONER
vs.
FRANK BOVA, SHERIFF RESPONDENT
JUDGMENT: PETITION DISMISSED
Writ of Mandamus Motion No. 472895 Order No. 473458
RELEASE DATE: April 4, 2014 FOR PETITIONER
Darllel B. Orr, pro se Inmate No. 0206100 Cuyahoga County Jail P.O. Box 5600 Cleveland, Ohio 44101
ATTORNEYS FOR RESPONDENT
Timothy J. McGinty Cuyahoga County Prosecutor By: Mary H. McGrath Assistant County Prosecutor The Justice Center 1200 Ontario Street Cleveland, Ohio 44113 FRANK D. CELEBREZZE, JR., P.J.:
{¶1} Darllel B. Orr has filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Orr alleges
that he is entitled to release from incarceration because “his current confinement is
unconstitutional pursuant [to] a patent lack of jurisdiction for failure to strickly [sic]
comport with O.R.C. 2945.05 [jury waiver].” We decline to issue a petition on behalf of
Orr.
{¶2} The Supreme Court of Ohio has established that a claim of a defective jury
waiver is not cognizable through a petition for a writ of habeas corpus and must be
addressed through a direct appeal. Bozsik v. Hudson, 110 Ohio St.3d 245,
2006-Ohio-4356, 852 N.E.2d 1200; Kelley v. Wilson, 103 Ohio St.3d 201,
2004-Ohio-4883, 814 N.E.2d 1222; State ex rel. Larkins v. Aurelius, 84 Ohio St.3d 112,
1998-Ohio-661, 702 N.E.2d 79.
{¶3} Accordingly, we grant the motion to dismiss filed by Frank Bova, Cuyahoga
County Sheriff. Costs to Orr. The court directs the clerk of court to serve all parties
with notice of this judgment and the date of entry upon the journal as required by Civ.R.
58(B).
{¶4} Petition dismissed.
FRANK D. CELEBREZZE, JR., PRESIDING JUDGE
KENNETH A. ROCCO, J., and MELODY J. STEWART, J., CONCUR
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2014 Ohio 1525, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-orr-v-bova-ohioctapp-2014.