State ex rel. Ormond v. Solon
This text of 742 N.E.2d 143 (State ex rel. Ormond v. Solon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In Mandamus. On motion for leave to intervene as respondents by Cameratta Properties, L.P., and DiSanto Enterprises, Inc. Motion granted.
On motion to dismiss and/or motion for summary judgment, answer of respondent, motion to strike affidavit in support of complaint, motion to dismiss or, in the alternative, motion for summary judgment by Cameratta Properties, L.P. et ah, motion to set response date to intervenor’s motion to dismiss if leave is granted, and motion to expedite review of complaint in mandamus. Motions to dismiss sustained. Cause dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
742 N.E.2d 143, 91 Ohio St. 3d 1444, 2001 Ohio LEXIS 371, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-ormond-v-solon-ohio-2001.