State ex rel. Ooten v. Siegel Interior Specialist Co.

705 N.E.2d 368, 84 Ohio St. 3d 1488, 1999 Ohio LEXIS 379
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedFebruary 3, 1999
Docket96-1421
StatusPublished

This text of 705 N.E.2d 368 (State ex rel. Ooten v. Siegel Interior Specialist Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State ex rel. Ooten v. Siegel Interior Specialist Co., 705 N.E.2d 368, 84 Ohio St. 3d 1488, 1999 Ohio LEXIS 379 (Ohio 1999).

Opinion

Franklin App. No. 95APD05-607. Reported at 84 Ohio St.3d 255, 703 N.E.2d 306. On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied.

Douglas, Resniok and Pfeifer, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State ex rel. Ooten v. Siegel Interior Specialists Co.
1998 Ohio 534 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
705 N.E.2d 368, 84 Ohio St. 3d 1488, 1999 Ohio LEXIS 379, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-ooten-v-siegel-interior-specialist-co-ohio-1999.