State ex rel. Ondusko v. Industrial Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

State ex rel. Ondusko v. Industrial Commission

683 N.E.2d 778, 79 Ohio St. 3d 382

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedSeptember 17, 1997

DocketNo. 95-795

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 683 N.E.2d 778 (State ex rel. Ondusko v. Industrial Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Ondusko v. Industrial Commission, 683 N.E.2d 778, 79 Ohio St. 3d 382 (Ohio 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The court of appeals based its vacation of the commission’s order exclusively on its decision in State ex rel. Draganic. We have since reversed Draganic, holding that an interlocutory award of permanent total disability compensation does not conclusively establish a claimant’s ■ right to continue permanent total disability compensation beyond the closed period awarded in the order. State ex rel. Draganic v. Indus. Comm. (1996), 75 Ohio St.3d 461, 663 N.E.2d 929.

In this case, no other challenge to the commission’s order denying further permanent total disability compensation has been made. Given our reversal of Draganic and the absence of any challenge to the evidentiary sufficiency of the commission’s order, our review can go no further.

Accordingly, the judgment of the court of appeals is reversed.

Judgment reversed.

Moyer, C.J., F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur. Douglas and Resnick, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI