State ex rel. O'Malley v. Collier-Williams

2017 Ohio 6964, 78 N.E.3d 907, 150 Ohio St. 3d 1405
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided July 26, 2017·No. 2017-0346·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

In Mandamus and Prohibition. On respondent’s motion to dismiss. Motion denied.

On motion for leave to intervene as respondent. Motion granted. On intervening respondent’s motion to dismiss or for judgment on the pleadings. Motion denied.

An alternative writ of prohibition is granted, and the following briefing schedule is set for presentation of evidence and filing of briefs pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. 12.05. The parties shall file any evidence they intend to present within 20 days; relator shall file a brief within ten days of the filing of the evidence; respondent shall file a brief within 20 days after the filing of relator’s brief; and relator may file a reply brief within seven days after the filing of respondent’s brief.

DeWine, J., would grant a peremptory writ of prohibition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. O'Malley v. Collier-Williams, 2017 Ohio 6964, 78 N.E.3d 907, 150 Ohio St. 3d 1405 (Ohio 2017).

2017 Ohio 6964 (State ex rel. O'Malley v. Collier-Williams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Landrum
2018 Ohio 1280 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2018)