State ex rel. Olmsted v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Elections

Ohio Supreme Court

State ex rel. Olmsted v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Elections

93 Ohio St. 3d 1277

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedOctober 9, 2001

Docket01-1752

StatusPublished

This text of 93 Ohio St. 3d 1277 (State ex rel. Olmsted v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Elections) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Olmsted v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Elections, 93 Ohio St. 3d 1277 (Ohio 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

In Mandamus. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of mandamus regarding an expedited election matter. Upon consideration of relator’s motion for a temporary restraining order,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion be, and hereby is, granted, and that the respondent be enjoined from issuing absentee ballots to registered voters in the city of North Olmsted until this cause is resolved.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Mandamus. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of mandamus regarding an expedited election matter. Upon consideration of relator’s motion for a temporary restraining order,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion be, and hereby is, granted, and that the respondent be enjoined from issuing absentee ballots to registered voters in the city of North Olmsted until this cause is resolved.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

93 Ohio St. 3d 1277, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-olmsted-v-cuyahoga-cty-bd-of-elections-ohio-2001.