State ex rel. Oler v. Ridgeway

25 A. 936, 55 N.J.L. 10, 26 Vroom 10, 1892 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 31
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided November 15, 1892·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

The opinion of the court was delivered by

This information has been filed to test the constitutionality of the statute entitled “An act to provide for the establishment of a commission of [11] public instruction in cities of the second class in this state whose population now exceeds, or may hereafter exceed, fifty, thousand.”

The respondent has been appointed a member of the commission thus authorized.

After a careful examination of the subject our conclusion is that the respondent is entitled to judgment, the statute in question being deemed by us constitutional on the grounds stated in the cases of the State v. Fury and that of the State-v. Caminade, decided at the present term.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. Oler v. Ridgeway, 25 A. 936, 55 N.J.L. 10, 26 Vroom 10, 1892 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 31 (N.J. 1892).

25 A. 936 (State ex rel. Oler v. Ridgeway) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State ex rel. McCarthy v. Queen
69 A. 30 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1908)
Lanning v. Commissioners of Public Instruction
51 A. 787 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1902)
State ex rel Rose v. Hufty
42 A. 836 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1899)
State ex rel. Brown v. Cline
41 A. 690 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1898)