State ex rel. Okocha v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bar Ass'n

Ohio Supreme Court

State ex rel. Okocha v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bar Ass'n

679 N.E.2d 1138, 79 Ohio St. 3d 1412, 1997 Ohio LEXIS 1853

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedJune 6, 1997

Docket97-1077

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 679 N.E.2d 1138 (State ex rel. Okocha v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bar Ass'n) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Okocha v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bar Ass'n, 679 N.E.2d 1138, 79 Ohio St. 3d 1412, 1997 Ohio LEXIS 1853 (Ohio 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

In Mandamus and Prohibition. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for writs of mandamus and prohibition and was considered in a manner prescribed by law. Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed sua sponte.

Moyer, C.J., and Lundberg Stratton, J., would hold for response. Dougeas, J., would hold for a response from respondents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Mandamus and Prohibition. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for writs of mandamus and prohibition and was considered in a manner prescribed by law. Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed sua sponte.

Moyer, C.J., and Lundberg Stratton, J., would hold for response. Dougeas, J., would hold for a response from respondents.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

679 N.E.2d 1138, 79 Ohio St. 3d 1412, 1997 Ohio LEXIS 1853, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-okocha-v-cuyahoga-cty-bar-assn-ohio-1997.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack