State ex rel. Okocha v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bar Ass'n

679 N.E.2d 1138, 79 Ohio St. 3d 1412, 1997 Ohio LEXIS 1853
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided June 6, 1997·No. 97-1077·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

In Mandamus and Prohibition. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for writs of mandamus and prohibition and was considered in a manner prescribed by law. Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed sua sponte.

Moyer, C.J., and Lundberg Stratton, J., would hold for response. Dougeas, J., would hold for a response from respondents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. Okocha v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bar Ass'n, 679 N.E.2d 1138, 79 Ohio St. 3d 1412, 1997 Ohio LEXIS 1853 (Ohio 1997).

679 N.E.2d 1138 (State ex rel. Okocha v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bar Ass'n) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cuyahoga Cty. Bar Assn. v. Okocha
1998 Ohio 183 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1998)