State Ex Rel. Oko v. McDonnell, Unpublished Decision (10-3-2007)

Ohio Court of Appeals

State Ex Rel. Oko v. McDonnell, Unpublished Decision (10-3-2007)

2007 Ohio 5331

CourtOhio Court of Appeals

DecidedOctober 3, 2007

DocketNo. 90119.

StatusUnpublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 2007 Ohio 5331 (State Ex Rel. Oko v. McDonnell, Unpublished Decision (10-3-2007)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State Ex Rel. Oko v. McDonnell, Unpublished Decision (10-3-2007), 2007 Ohio 5331 (Ohio Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION *Page 3 {¶ 1} Relator, Michael Oko, requests that this court compel respondent judge to: rule on Oko's petition for postconviction relief filed inState v. Oko, Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas Case No. CR-447702 on September 6, 2006; issue findings of fact and conclusions of law with respect to the petition for postconviction relief; rule on his motion for transcript to facilitate postconviction proceedings; and rule on his motion for grand jury minutes.

{¶ 2} Respondent has filed a motion to dismiss, which this court converted to a motion for summary judgment in Entry No. 399422, dated August 16, 2007, attached to which are copies of entries denying Oko's petition for postconviction relief, his motion for transcript and his motion for grand jury minutes as well as findings of fact and conclusions of law issued by respondent and received for filing by the clerk on July 11, 2007. Relator has not opposed respondent's motion. Respondent argues that she has discharged her duty with respect to each of Oko's requests for relief in this action in mandamus. We agree and hold that Oko's complaint is moot.

{¶ 3} Accordingly, respondent's motion for summary judgment is granted. Relator to pay costs. The clerk is directed to serve upon the parties notice of this judgment and its date of entry upon the journal. Civ.R. 58(B).

Complaint denied.

*Page 4

SEAN C. GALLAGHER, P.J., and KENNETH A. ROCCO, J., CONCUR.

*Page 1

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION *Page 3 {¶ 1} Relator, Michael Oko, requests that this court compel respondent judge to: rule on Oko's petition for postconviction relief filed inState v. Oko, Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas Case No. CR-447702 on September 6, 2006; issue findings of fact and conclusions of law with respect to the petition for postconviction relief; rule on his motion for transcript to facilitate postconviction proceedings; and rule on his motion for grand jury minutes.

{¶ 2} Respondent has filed a motion to dismiss, which this court converted to a motion for summary judgment in Entry No. 399422, dated August 16, 2007, attached to which are copies of entries denying Oko's petition for postconviction relief, his motion for transcript and his motion for grand jury minutes as well as findings of fact and conclusions of law issued by respondent and received for filing by the clerk on July 11, 2007. Relator has not opposed respondent's motion. Respondent argues that she has discharged her duty with respect to each of Oko's requests for relief in this action in mandamus. We agree and hold that Oko's complaint is moot.

{¶ 3} Accordingly, respondent's motion for summary judgment is granted. Relator to pay costs. The clerk is directed to serve upon the parties notice of this judgment and its date of entry upon the journal. Civ.R. 58(B).

Complaint denied.

*Page 4

SEAN C. GALLAGHER, P.J., and KENNETH A. ROCCO, J., CONCUR.

*Page 1

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2007 Ohio 5331, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-oko-v-mcdonnell-unpublished-decision-10-3-2007-ohioctapp-2007.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack