State Ex Rel. Oklahoma City Bldg. & Loan Ass'n v. Hooker

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

State Ex Rel. Oklahoma City Bldg. & Loan Ass'n v. Hooker

29 P.2d 21, 167 Okla. 208, 1933 Okla. LEXIS 842

CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma

DecidedOctober 17, 1933

Docket24701

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 29 P.2d 21 (State Ex Rel. Oklahoma City Bldg. & Loan Ass'n v. Hooker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State Ex Rel. Oklahoma City Bldg. & Loan Ass'n v. Hooker, 29 P.2d 21, 167 Okla. 208, 1933 Okla. LEXIS 842 (Okla. 1933).

Pincite

Opinions

ANDREWS, J.

This is an original action in this court wherein the Oklahoma City B-uilding & Loan Association seeks a writ of mandamus against Sam Hooker, district judge, to compel him to grant a default judgment.

In the petition it was alleged that on February 25, 1933, the plaintiff commenced an action in the district court of Oklahoma county against Ruth B. Carson and the Citizens Finance Company, the same being an action upon a promissory note and for foreclosure of a real estate mortgage; that summons was duly issued, served, and returned; that the time for answer expired on March 24, 1933; that on May 8, 1933, the plaintiff filed a written .motion for a default judgment, which was presented to the defendant as one of the judges of the Thirteenth judicial district of the state of Oklahoma, and that after a hearing on said motion the defendant denied the motion for judgment *209 and stated that liis sole ground for so doing was Senate Bill No. 76 of the Fourteenth Legislature of Oklahoma, chapter 16, Session Laws 1933, effective March 7, 1933.

The issues in this case are controlled by the decision of this court, this’day rendered, in State of Oklahoma ex rel. Osage County Savings & Loan Association, a Corporation, Plaintiff in Error, v. Jesse J. Worten, Judge of the District Court of Osage County, State of Oklahoma, Defendant in Error, 167 Okla. 187, 29 P. (2d) 1. The law announced therein is adopted as the law of this case and the decision therein is applied herein.

The' writ of mandamus is ordered to issue, directing the trial court to proceed with the cause in question without regard to the provisions o"f Senate- Bill No. 76 of the Fourteenth Legislature and to apply the law and follow the procedure existing at the time of the commencement of the action in that court.

RILEY, O. J., and iBAYLESS, BUSBY, and WELCH, JJ., concur. SWINDALL, MCNEILL, and OSBORN, JJ., dissent. CULLISON, Y. O. J., absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ANDREWS, J.

This is an original action in this court wherein the Oklahoma City B-uilding & Loan Association seeks a writ of mandamus against Sam Hooker, district judge, to compel him to grant a default judgment.

In the petition it was alleged that on February 25, 1933, the plaintiff commenced an action in the district court of Oklahoma county against Ruth B. Carson and the Citizens Finance Company, the same being an action upon a promissory note and for foreclosure of a real estate mortgage; that summons was duly issued, served, and returned; that the time for answer expired on March 24, 1933; that on May 8, 1933, the plaintiff filed a written .motion for a default judgment, which was presented to the defendant as one of the judges of the Thirteenth judicial district of the state of Oklahoma, and that after a hearing on said motion the defendant denied the motion for judgment *209 and stated that liis sole ground for so doing was Senate Bill No. 76 of the Fourteenth Legislature of Oklahoma, chapter 16, Session Laws 1933, effective March 7, 1933.

The issues in this case are controlled by the decision of this court, this’day rendered, in State of Oklahoma ex rel. Osage County Savings & Loan Association, a Corporation, Plaintiff in Error, v. Jesse J. Worten, Judge of the District Court of Osage County, State of Oklahoma, Defendant in Error, 167 Okla. 187, 29 P. (2d) 1. The law announced therein is adopted as the law of this case and the decision therein is applied herein.

The' writ of mandamus is ordered to issue, directing the trial court to proceed with the cause in question without regard to the provisions o"f Senate- Bill No. 76 of the Fourteenth Legislature and to apply the law and follow the procedure existing at the time of the commencement of the action in that court.

RILEY, O. J., and iBAYLESS, BUSBY, and WELCH, JJ., concur. SWINDALL, MCNEILL, and OSBORN, JJ., dissent. CULLISON, Y. O. J., absent.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

29 P.2d 21, 167 Okla. 208, 1933 Okla. LEXIS 842, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-oklahoma-city-bldg-loan-assn-v-hooker-okla-1933.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack