State ex rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. Thomas

1995 OK 142, 912 P.2d 319, 1995 WL 761434
CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma
DecidedDecember 15, 1995
DocketSCBD No. 3930
StatusPublished

This text of 1995 OK 142 (State ex rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. Thomas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State ex rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. Thomas, 1995 OK 142, 912 P.2d 319, 1995 WL 761434 (Okla. 1995).

Opinion

ORDER

This Court sua sponte issues the instant Order making certain modifications to the official opinion in this matter reported at State ex rel. Oklahoma Bar Association v. Thomas, 886 P.2d 477 (Okla.1994), which modifications reflect the true intent of our previous Order of December 15, 1994, in the above styled matter. The modifications here have as their intent, as did the previous Order of December 15, 1994, which granted respondent’s petition for rehearing for a limited purpose, striking references in our opinion of October 25, 1994, to respondent’s suspension from the practice of law and instead imposing solely the discipline of public censure. The modifications made by the instant Order are as follows:

1. The last paragraph of the opinion appearing immediately before the vote of the Justices at 886 P.2d at 480, currently reading: “RESPONDENT PUBLICLY CENSORED, SUSPENDED FROM PRACTICE OF LAW FOR SIXTY DAYS, AND ORDERED TO PAY COSTS.”, is deleted and the following is substituted in its place: RESPONDENT PUBLICLY CENSURED AND ORDERED TO PAY COSTS.

2. The vote of the Justices appearing at 886 P.2d at 480, currently reading:

“LAVENDER, V.C.J., and OPALA, KAU-GER and WATT, JJ., concur. HARGRAVE, J., with whom ALMA WILSON, J., joins, concurs in discipline, but dissents from imposition of the sixty day suspension. SUMMERS, J., not participating.”, is deleted and the following is substituted in its place: HODGES, C.J., LAVENDER, V.C.J., HARGRAVE, WILSON, KAUGER, and WATT, JJ., concur. SIMMS and OPALA, JJ., dissent. SUMMERS, J., not participating. WILSON, C.J., KAUGER, V.C.J., and HODGES, LAVENDER, HARGRAVE, OPALA and WATT, JJ., concur.

SIMMS, J., dissents.

SUMMERS, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. Thomas
886 P.2d 477 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1995 OK 142, 912 P.2d 319, 1995 WL 761434, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-oklahoma-bar-assn-v-thomas-okla-1995.