State ex rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. Coe

1993 OK 26, 852 P.2d 697, 1993 Okla. LEXIS 200
Supreme Court of Oklahoma·Decided March 16, 1993·No. OBAD NO. 1073; SCBD NO. 3855·Published

Opinions

ORDER

Having examined and considered all matters presented in this disciplinary proceeding, including the Complaint presented by the Professional Responsibility Commission with recommended discipline, Answer of Respondent, and Proposed Stipulations of Fact and Conclusions of Law with Agreed Recommendation for Discipline, THE COURT FINDS:

1. Respondent is a member of the Oklahoma Bar Association.
2. While suspended from the practice of law for failure to comply with Mandatory Continuing Legal Education requirements, the respondent engaged in the practice of law in violation of Rule 5.5 of the Oklahoma Rules of Professional Conduct.

3. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED BY THE COURT that respondent be and is hereby publicly reprimanded. It is further ordered that respondent pay all costs of these proceedings in the amount of $462.94.

HODGES, C.J., LAVENDER, V.C.J., SIMMS, HARGRAVE, OPALA and WATT, JJ., concur. ALMA WILSON and KAUGER, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. Coe, 1993 OK 26, 852 P.2d 697, 1993 Okla. LEXIS 200 (Okla. 1993).

1993 OK 26 (State ex rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. Coe) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.