State ex rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. Biggers

1999 OK 28, 981 P.2d 803, 70 O.B.A.J. 1068, 1999 Okla. LEXIS 21, 1999 WL 299028
CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma
DecidedApril 6, 1999
DocketNo. SCBD 4424
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 1999 OK 28 (State ex rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. Biggers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State ex rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. Biggers, 1999 OK 28, 981 P.2d 803, 70 O.B.A.J. 1068, 1999 Okla. LEXIS 21, 1999 WL 299028 (Okla. 1999).

Opinion

ORDER APPROVING RESIGNATION FROM OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION PENDING DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS

Upon consideration of the complainant’s, Oklahoma Bar Association (Bar Association), application for an order approving the resignation of the respondent, Douglas Kirk Big-gers (Biggers/attorney), pending disciplinary proceedings, the application reveals:

1)On March 4, 1999, the respondent submitted his written affidavit of resignation from membership in the Bar Association pending investigation of a disciplinary proceeding.
2) The respondent’s affidavit of resignation reflects that: a) it was freely and voluntarily rendered; b) he was not subject to coercion or duress; and c) he was fully aware of the consequences of submitting the resignation. The respondent states that although he is aware that the resignation is subject to the approval of the Oklahoma Supreme Court, he will treat it as effective on the date of filing.
3) The respondent states in his affidavit of resignation that he is aware of a grievance filed against him with the Office of the General Counsel of the Oklahoma Bar Association. The grievance alleges that the respondent: a) fraudulently concealed and converted funds belonging to his law corporation and to his clients; and b) provided false and misleading information when questioned concerning the allegations. Rules 1.3 and 1.4, Rules Governing Disciplinary Proceedings, 5 O.S.1991, Ch. 1, App. 1-A; Rules 1.15 and 8.4, Rules of Professional Conduct, 5 O.S.1991 Ch. 1, App. 3-A.
4) The respondent waives any and all right to contest the allegations outlined in the affidavit.
5) The respondent’s resignation pending disciplinary proceedings is in compliance with all of the requirements set forth in Rule 8.1, Rules Governing Disciplinary Proceedings, 5 O.S.1991, Ch. 1, App. 1-A, and it should be approved.
6) The official roster address of the respondent as shown by the Bar Association records is: 309 W. Main St., Norman, Oklahoma 73069.
7) No costs have been incurred by the Bar Association in the investigation of this matter.
8) The respondent acknowledges that his actions may result in claims against the Client Security Fund and agrees to reimburse the Fund for any disbursements made because of his actions.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the resig[804]*804nation of Douglas Kirk Biggers pending disciplinary proceedings be approved.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED THAT the name of Douglas Kirk Biggers be stricken from the roll of attorneys. Because resignation pending disciplinary proceedings is tantamount to disbarment, the respondent may not make application for reinstatement prior to the expiration of five (5) years from the date of this order. Pursuant to Rule 9.1, Rules Governing Disciplinary Proceedings, 5 O.S.1991, Ch. 1, App. 1-A, the respondent shall notify all of his clients having legal business pending with him within twenty (20) days, by certified mail, of his inability to represent them and of the necessity for promptly retaining new counsel. Repayment to the Client Security Fund for any monies expended because of the malfeasance or non-feasance of the respondent shall be a condition of the reinstatement.

All Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

STATE EX REL. OKLA. BAR ASS'N v. Bourland
2001 OK 12 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 2001)
State ex rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. Bourland
2001 OK 12 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1999 OK 28, 981 P.2d 803, 70 O.B.A.J. 1068, 1999 Okla. LEXIS 21, 1999 WL 299028, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-oklahoma-bar-assn-v-biggers-okla-1999.