State ex rel. Ohio National Bank v. Lancione
Opinion
The relator questions the sufficiency and validity of the referendum petition and its several parts. Primarily, ONB complains that the part petitions are not in conformity with R. C. 3501.38(E) and (J) and R. C. 731.29 to 731.40.
R. C. 731.41 specifically excludes municipalities which have adopted charter provisions for initiative and referendum procedures applicable to their own legislative measures from compliance with R. C. 731.28 to 731.41. R. C. 731.41 is a codification of the “home-rule” provision of the Ohio Constitution (Article XVIII), and has been so recognized by this court in Dillon v. Cleveland (1927), 117 Ohio St. 258.
The Columbus City Charter contains comprehensive provisions relating to referendum procedures.
Footnotes
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
377 N.E.2d 507 (State ex rel. Ohio National Bank v. Lancione) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.