State ex rel. Ohio National Bank v. Lancione

377 N.E.2d 507, 54 Ohio St. 2d 416, 8 Ohio Op. 3d 412, 1978 Ohio LEXIS 592
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided June 21, 1978·No. No. 78-405·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The relator questions the sufficiency and validity of the referendum petition and its several parts. Primarily, ONB complains that the part petitions are not in conformity with R. C. 3501.38(E) and (J) and R. C. 731.29 to 731.40.

R. C. 731.41 specifically excludes municipalities which have adopted charter provisions for initiative and referendum procedures applicable to their own legislative measures from compliance with R. C. 731.28 to 731.41. R. C. 731.41 is a codification of the “home-rule” provision of the Ohio Constitution (Article XVIII), and has been so recognized by this court in Dillon v. Cleveland (1927), 117 Ohio St. 258.

The Columbus City Charter contains comprehensive provisions relating to referendum procedures.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. Ohio National Bank v. Lancione, 377 N.E.2d 507, 54 Ohio St. 2d 416, 8 Ohio Op. 3d 412, 1978 Ohio LEXIS 592 (Ohio 1978).

377 N.E.2d 507 (State ex rel. Ohio National Bank v. Lancione) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State ex rel. Blackman v. Hitte
449 N.E.2d 1279 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1983)
State ex rel. Madison v. Cotner
423 N.E.2d 72 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1981)