State ex rel. Ohio Heritage Dev. Co. v. Portage Cty. Bd. of Elections
This text of 736 N.E.2d 476 (State ex rel. Ohio Heritage Dev. Co. v. Portage Cty. Bd. of Elections) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In Prohibition. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of prohibition regarding an expedited election matter. Upon consideration of respondents’ motion to strike relator’s merit brief,
IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion to strike relator’s merit brief be, and hereby is, granted, and that relator’s brief be stricken for failure to comply with S.CtPrac.R. XIV(2)(A).
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed under S.Ct.Prac.R. X(12) for want of prosecution.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
736 N.E.2d 476, 90 Ohio St. 3d 1436, 2000 Ohio LEXIS 2552, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-ohio-heritage-dev-co-v-portage-cty-bd-of-elections-ohio-2000.