State ex rel. Ohio Edison Co. v. Parrott

648 N.E.2d 837, 72 Ohio St. 3d 1424
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedApril 28, 1995
Docket95-787
StatusPublished

This text of 648 N.E.2d 837 (State ex rel. Ohio Edison Co. v. Parrott) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State ex rel. Ohio Edison Co. v. Parrott, 648 N.E.2d 837, 72 Ohio St. 3d 1424 (Ohio 1995).

Opinion

In Prohibition. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of prohibition.

IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, effective April 24,1995, that an alternative writ be, and hereby is, granted, and the following briefing schedule is set for presentation of evidence and filing of briefs pursuant to S.CtPrac.R. X:

The parties shall file any evidence they intend to present on or before May 8,1995; relator shall file its brief within seven days after the filing of evidence; and respondent shall file his brief within seven days after the filing of relator’s brief; and relator shall file his reply brief, if any, within three days after the filing of respondent’s brief.

Pfeifer, J., dissents. Cook, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
648 N.E.2d 837, 72 Ohio St. 3d 1424, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-ohio-edison-co-v-parrott-ohio-1995.