State ex rel. Ohio Edison Co. v. Parrott
This text of 648 N.E.2d 837 (State ex rel. Ohio Edison Co. v. Parrott) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In Prohibition. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of prohibition.
IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, effective April 24,1995, that an alternative writ be, and hereby is, granted, and the following briefing schedule is set for presentation of evidence and filing of briefs pursuant to S.CtPrac.R. X:
The parties shall file any evidence they intend to present on or before May 8,1995; relator shall file its brief within seven days after the filing of evidence; and respondent shall file his brief within seven days after the filing of relator’s brief; and relator shall file his reply brief, if any, within three days after the filing of respondent’s brief.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
648 N.E.2d 837, 72 Ohio St. 3d 1424, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-ohio-edison-co-v-parrott-ohio-1995.