State ex rel. Ohio Civ. Rights Comm. v. McMonagle

3 N.E.3d 1223, 138 Ohio St. 3d 1424
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedFebruary 27, 2014
Docket2014-0295
StatusPublished

This text of 3 N.E.3d 1223 (State ex rel. Ohio Civ. Rights Comm. v. McMonagle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State ex rel. Ohio Civ. Rights Comm. v. McMonagle, 3 N.E.3d 1223, 138 Ohio St. 3d 1424 (Ohio 2014).

Opinion

In Prohibition. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of prohibition.

Upon consideration of relators’ emergency motion for peremptory or alternative writ of prohibition, it is ordered by the court that respondent shall file a response to the complaint within 10 days of the date of this entry in accordance with S.Ct.Prac.R. 12.04. If respondent files a motion to dismiss or a motion for judgment on the pleadings in response to the complaint, relators may file a memorandum in response within five days of the filing of the motion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
3 N.E.3d 1223, 138 Ohio St. 3d 1424, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-ohio-civ-rights-comm-v-mcmonagle-ohio-2014.