State ex rel. Ohio Civ. Rights Comm. v. McMonagle

Ohio Supreme Court

State ex rel. Ohio Civ. Rights Comm. v. McMonagle

3 N.E.3d 1223, 138 Ohio St. 3d 1424

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided February 27, 2014·No. 2014-0295·Published

Opinion

In Prohibition. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of prohibition.

Upon consideration of relators’ emergency motion for peremptory or alternative writ of prohibition, it is ordered by the court that respondent shall file a response to the complaint within 10 days of the date of this entry in accordance with S.Ct.Prac.R. 12.04. If respondent files a motion to dismiss or a motion for judgment on the pleadings in response to the complaint, relators may file a memorandum in response within five days of the filing of the motion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Prohibition. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of prohibition.

Upon consideration of relators’ emergency motion for peremptory or alternative writ of prohibition, it is ordered by the court that respondent shall file a response to the complaint within 10 days of the date of this entry in accordance with S.Ct.Prac.R. 12.04. If respondent files a motion to dismiss or a motion for judgment on the pleadings in response to the complaint, relators may file a memorandum in response within five days of the filing of the motion.

State ex rel. Ohio Civ. Rights Comm. v. McMonagle, 3 N.E.3d 1223, 138 Ohio St. 3d 1424 (Ohio 2014).

Pincite

3 N.E.3d 1223 (State ex rel. Ohio Civ. Rights Comm. v. McMonagle) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.