State ex rel. Oberer Dev. Co. v. Montgomery Cty. Bd. of Elections

Ohio Supreme Court

State ex rel. Oberer Dev. Co. v. Montgomery Cty. Bd. of Elections

670 N.E.2d 478, 77 Ohio St. 3d 1403

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedOctober 7, 1996

Docket96-2154

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 670 N.E.2d 478 (State ex rel. Oberer Dev. Co. v. Montgomery Cty. Bd. of Elections) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Oberer Dev. Co. v. Montgomery Cty. Bd. of Elections, 670 N.E.2d 478, 77 Ohio St. 3d 1403 (Ohio 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

Montgomery App. No. 16075. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal and cross-appeal from the Court of Appeals for Montgomery County. On October 4, 1996, appellants/cross-appellees filed a merit brief that was due October 3,1996. S.CtPrae.R. XIV(1)(C) prohibits the filing of a brief that is not timely tendered for filing. Accordingly,

[1404]*1404IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that the merit brief be, and hereby is, stricken, and the appeal of appellants/cross-appellees, Ritva Williamson et al., be, and hereby is, dismissed for want of prosecution.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that the brief of cross-appellants shall be due on or before October 7, 1996; brief of cross-appellees shall be due within three days after cross-appellants’ brief; reply brief of cross-appellants shall be due within three days after cross-appellees’ brief; and the pending cross-appeal shall otherwise be briefed in accordance with S.Ct.Prac.R. VT(1),(2) and (3).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Montgomery App. No. 16075. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal and cross-appeal from the Court of Appeals for Montgomery County. On October 4, 1996, appellants/cross-appellees filed a merit brief that was due October 3,1996. S.CtPrae.R. XIV(1)(C) prohibits the filing of a brief that is not timely tendered for filing. Accordingly,

[1404]*1404IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that the merit brief be, and hereby is, stricken, and the appeal of appellants/cross-appellees, Ritva Williamson et al., be, and hereby is, dismissed for want of prosecution.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that the brief of cross-appellants shall be due on or before October 7, 1996; brief of cross-appellees shall be due within three days after cross-appellants’ brief; reply brief of cross-appellants shall be due within three days after cross-appellees’ brief; and the pending cross-appeal shall otherwise be briefed in accordance with S.Ct.Prac.R. VT(1),(2) and (3).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

670 N.E.2d 478, 77 Ohio St. 3d 1403, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-oberer-dev-co-v-montgomery-cty-bd-of-elections-ohio-1996.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack