State ex rel. Oatley v. Athens County Clerk

431 N.E.2d 682, 69 Ohio St. 2d 257
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided February 17, 1982·No. No. 81-1059·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

In dismissing appellant’s complaint for a writ of mandamus, the Court of Appeals held that mandamus will not lie because appellant has an adequate remedy at law. We agree.

Local Rule 3 of the Rules of Practice of the Court of Common Pleas of Athens County provides, in part:

“Unless a Poverty Affidavit is filed, a deposit * * * is required as security for costs * * * .
“No complaint will be accepted for filing by the clerk where the party seeking the filing of said action has failed to pay costs previously incurred, unless costs are waived due to indigency of the party.” (Emphasis added.)

[258] In order to file his damages complaint, appellant merely has to file poverty affidavits and request waivers from the court. Under these circumstances, appellant has an adequate remedy at law. See State, ex rel. Harris, v. Fuerst (1980), 64 Ohio St. 2d 130.

Accordingly, the judgment of the Court of Appeals is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Celebrezze, C. J., W. Brown, Sweeney, Locher, Holmes, C. Brown and Krupansky, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. Oatley v. Athens County Clerk, 431 N.E.2d 682, 69 Ohio St. 2d 257 (Ohio 1982).

431 N.E.2d 682 (State ex rel. Oatley v. Athens County Clerk) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Hypes
2019 Ohio 4096 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2019)
State ex rel. Workman v. Miller
2016 Ohio 1494 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2016)
State v. Willis
2014 Ohio 114 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2014)
State v. Robinson
2013 Ohio 4375 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2013)