State ex rel. Nozik v. Ford
664 N.E.2d 536, 75 Ohio St. 3d 1483
Opinion
In Prohibition. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of prohibition. Upon consideration of relator’s motion for issuance of an alternative writ,
IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion for issuance of an alternative writ be, and hereby is, denied.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State ex rel. Nozik v. Ford, 664 N.E.2d 536, 75 Ohio St. 3d 1483 (Ohio 1996).
664 N.E.2d 536 (State ex rel. Nozik v. Ford) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Brown
789 N.E.2d 210 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2003)