State ex rel. Nozik v. Ford
664 N.E.2d 536, 75 Ohio St. 3d 1483
This text of 664 N.E.2d 536 (State ex rel. Nozik v. Ford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
State ex rel. Nozik v. Ford, 664 N.E.2d 536, 75 Ohio St. 3d 1483 (Ohio 1996).
Opinion
In Prohibition. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of prohibition. Upon consideration of relator’s motion for issuance of an alternative writ,
IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion for issuance of an alternative writ be, and hereby is, denied.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Brown
789 N.E.2d 210 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2003)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
664 N.E.2d 536, 75 Ohio St. 3d 1483, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-nozik-v-ford-ohio-1996.