State ex rel. Novak v. Ohio Atty. Gen.

790 N.E.2d 1215, 99 Ohio St. 3d 1450
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 2, 2003
Docket2003-0718
StatusPublished

This text of 790 N.E.2d 1215 (State ex rel. Novak v. Ohio Atty. Gen.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State ex rel. Novak v. Ohio Atty. Gen., 790 N.E.2d 1215, 99 Ohio St. 3d 1450 (Ohio 2003).

Opinion

In Mandamus and Prohibition. On answer of respondents. On S.Ct.Prac.R. X(5) determination, cause dismissed.

Moyer, C.J., Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor and O’Donnell, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
790 N.E.2d 1215, 99 Ohio St. 3d 1450, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-novak-v-ohio-atty-gen-ohio-2003.