State Ex Rel. North Carolina Bank & Trust Co. v. Parker
This text of 167 S.E. 495 (State Ex Rel. North Carolina Bank & Trust Co. v. Parker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The rule, generally accordant with the decisions, is that, jurisdiction to appoint a successor to a guardian ordinarily resides with the court making the original appointment, though the residence of the ward may have been changed in the meantime. 28 O. J., 1109. Especially is this so, where, as here, suit against the original guardian and his surety is necessary to obtain a settlement. 15 A. & E. Enc. of Law, 35 and 120.
Nor are our own decisions contrariwise. Credle v. Baugham, 152 N. C., 18, 67 S. E., 46.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
167 S.E. 495, 204 N.C. 54, 1933 N.C. LEXIS 320, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-north-carolina-bank-trust-co-v-parker-nc-1933.