State ex rel. Norfolk S. Ry. Co. v. Hanna

880 N.E.2d 487, 116 Ohio St. 3d 1513
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided February 7, 2008·No. 2008-0031·Published

Opinion

In Mandamus and Prohibition. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of mandamus and prohibition. Upon consideration of relator’s application for dismissal,

It is ordered by the court that the application for dismissal is granted. Accordingly, this cause is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. Norfolk S. Ry. Co. v. Hanna, 880 N.E.2d 487, 116 Ohio St. 3d 1513 (Ohio 2008).

880 N.E.2d 487 (State ex rel. Norfolk S. Ry. Co. v. Hanna) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.