State Ex Rel. Niederlehner v. Ryan

185 N.E. 882, 125 Ohio St. 635, 125 Ohio St. (N.S.) 635, 1932 Ohio LEXIS 268
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedMay 25, 1932
Docket23470
StatusPublished

This text of 185 N.E. 882 (State Ex Rel. Niederlehner v. Ryan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State Ex Rel. Niederlehner v. Ryan, 185 N.E. 882, 125 Ohio St. 635, 125 Ohio St. (N.S.) 635, 1932 Ohio LEXIS 268 (Ohio 1932).

Opinion

The Court find that the petition does not state a cause of action and the demurrer is therefore sustained upon the authority of and for the reasons set forth in the opinion of this Court in the case of Waldron v . New York Central Ry. Co., 106 Ohio St., 371. And said relator not desiring to plead further, it is ordered and adjudged by the Court that the writ of mandamus prayed for be, and the same is hereby, denied:

Writ denied.

Marshall, C. J., Jones, Matthias, Day, Allen, Kinkade and Stephenson, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
185 N.E. 882, 125 Ohio St. 635, 125 Ohio St. (N.S.) 635, 1932 Ohio LEXIS 268, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-niederlehner-v-ryan-ohio-1932.