State Ex Rel. Niederlehner v. Ryan
This text of 185 N.E. 882 (State Ex Rel. Niederlehner v. Ryan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The Court find that the petition does not state a cause of action and the demurrer is therefore sustained upon the authority of and for the reasons set forth in the opinion of this Court in the case of Waldron v . New York Central Ry. Co., 106 Ohio St., 371. And said relator not desiring to plead further, it is ordered and adjudged by the Court that the writ of mandamus prayed for be, and the same is hereby, denied:
Writ denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
185 N.E. 882, 125 Ohio St. 635, 125 Ohio St. (N.S.) 635, 1932 Ohio LEXIS 268, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-niederlehner-v-ryan-ohio-1932.