State ex rel. Nicholson v. State

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State ex rel. Nicholson v. State

720 So. 2d 675, 1998 La. LEXIS 1937, 1998 WL 484663

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedJune 5, 1998

DocketNo. 98-KH-0130

StatusPublished

This text of 720 So. 2d 675 (State ex rel. Nicholson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Nicholson v. State, 720 So. 2d 675, 1998 La. LEXIS 1937, 1998 WL 484663 (La. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

In re Nicholson, Floyd;—Plaintiff(s); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writ; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “A”, No. 348-379; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 97KW-1901.

Denied.

KIMBALL, J., not on panel. CALOGERO, C.J., concurs in the denial. In connection with his detailed factual summary of the case and its procedural history, counsel’s pithy discussion of the issues he considered and rejected as the basis of the appeal demonstrates to the reviewing court that counsel satisfied his duty to his client by “casting] an advocate’s eye over the trial record and consider[] whether any ruling made by the trial ... had a significant, adverse impact on shaping the evidence presented to the jury for its consideration.” State v. Jyles, 96-2669 (La. 12/12/97), 704 So.2d 241.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Nicholson, Floyd;—Plaintiff(s); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writ; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “A”, No. 348-379; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 97KW-1901.

Denied.

KIMBALL, J., not on panel. CALOGERO, C.J., concurs in the denial. In connection with his detailed factual summary of the case and its procedural history, counsel’s pithy discussion of the issues he considered and rejected as the basis of the appeal demonstrates to the reviewing court that counsel satisfied his duty to his client by “casting] an advocate’s eye over the trial record and consider[] whether any ruling made by the trial ... had a significant, adverse impact on shaping the evidence presented to the jury for its consideration.” State v. Jyles, 96-2669 (La. 12/12/97), 704 So.2d 241.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

720 So. 2d 675, 1998 La. LEXIS 1937, 1998 WL 484663, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-nicholson-v-state-la-1998.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack