State ex rel. Nicholson v. State

720 So. 2d 675, 1998 La. LEXIS 1937, 1998 WL 484663
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided June 5, 1998·No. No. 98-KH-0130·Published

Opinion

In re Nicholson, Floyd;—Plaintiff(s); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writ; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “A”, No. 348-379; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 97KW-1901.

Denied.

KIMBALL, J., not on panel. CALOGERO, C.J., concurs in the denial. In connection with his detailed factual summary of the case and its procedural history, counsel’s pithy discussion of the issues he considered and rejected as the basis of the appeal demonstrates to the reviewing court that counsel satisfied his duty to his client by “casting] an advocate’s eye over the trial record and consider[] whether any ruling made by the trial ... had a significant, adverse impact on shaping the evidence presented to the jury for its consideration.” State v. Jyles, 96-2669 (La. 12/12/97), 704 So.2d 241.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. Nicholson v. State, 720 So. 2d 675, 1998 La. LEXIS 1937, 1998 WL 484663 (La. 1998).

720 So. 2d 675 (State ex rel. Nicholson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Jyles
704 So. 2d 241 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1997)