State Ex Rel. Nicholl v. Miller

187 N.E. 75, 127 Ohio St. 103, 127 Ohio St. (N.S.) 103, 1933 Ohio LEXIS 330
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided June 15, 1933·No. 24094·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

This cause came on to be heard upon the demurrer to the reply, and was argued by counsel. On consideration whereof, it is ordered and adjudged that such demurrer be sustained for the reason that while the ordinance in question provides for an addition to an existing public utility and not for the acquisition or construction of a public utility, and hence is subject to referendum, not under the Constitution of Ohio, Article XVIII, Section 5, but under Section 4227-1 et seq., General Code, the petition does not contain a sufficient number of signatures to require the respondent to certify the same to the board of elections. State, ex rel. Kahle, v. Rupert, Aud., 99 Ohio St., 17.

Relator not desiring to plead further, the writ of mandamus is denied.

Writ denied.

Weygandt, C. J., Day, Allen, Stephenson, Jones and Matthias, JJ., concur Bevis, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State Ex Rel. Nicholl v. Miller, 187 N.E. 75, 127 Ohio St. 103, 127 Ohio St. (N.S.) 103, 1933 Ohio LEXIS 330 (Ohio 1933).

187 N.E. 75 (State Ex Rel. Nicholl v. Miller) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lynn v. Supple
166 Ohio St. (N.S.) 154 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1957)
State Ex Rel. City of Fostoria v. King
94 N.E.2d 697 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1950)
STATE Ex SHELL, v. ABBOTT Et
8 N.E.2d 254 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1936)