State Ex Rel. Nicholl v. Miller
This text of 187 N.E. 75 (State Ex Rel. Nicholl v. Miller) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This cause came on to be heard upon the demurrer to the reply, and was argued by counsel. On consideration whereof, it is ordered and adjudged that such demurrer be sustained for the reason that while the ordinance in question provides for an addition to an existing public utility and not for the acquisition or construction of a public utility, and hence is subject to referendum, not under the Constitution of Ohio, Article XVIII, Section 5, but under Section 4227-1 et seq., General Code, the petition does not contain a sufficient number of signatures to require the respondent to certify the same to the board of elections. State, ex rel. Kahle, v. Rupert, Aud., 99 Ohio St., 17.
Relator not desiring to plead further, the writ of mandamus is denied.
Writ denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
187 N.E. 75, 127 Ohio St. 103, 127 Ohio St. (N.S.) 103, 1933 Ohio LEXIS 330, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-nicholl-v-miller-ohio-1933.