State ex rel. Newton v. Herring

71 So. 679, 196 Ala. 455, 1916 Ala. LEXIS 389
Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided April 21, 1916·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

THOMAS, J.

The appellant seeks by writ of prohibition to prevent the respondent, James L. Herring, as judge of probate of St. Clair county, Ala., from placing the names of Burrell Bowlin and others, so registered, on the official list of voters for said county.- The averments of the petition are admitted to be true by said judge of probate. They are, in substance, that there was no qualified registrar for said county from November 1, 1915, to February 6, 1916; that prior to November 5, 1915, the Governor' appointed one Hardee Cornett as registrar for said county, for the purpose of registering the qualified voters under the act of 1915 (Acts 1915, pp. 239-248) ; that Cornett did not qualify, nor enter upon the discharge of the duties of the office of registrar; that there was no registrar for said county, who had the right, and on whom rested the duty, to register the voters of said county, until after January 6, 1916. The petition further alleges that' after January 6, 1916, the Governor appointed R. F. Ashley as registrar of said county, who qualified as such and entered upon the discharge of the duties of the office; that he gave the prescribed notice that he would visit certain precincts of said county during the month of March, 1916, for the purpose of registering persons entitled to be registered; that he did register, at Ashville, at the courthouse, on March 1, 1916, the said Burrell Bowlin, and others, who had not theretofore been registered but who were entitled to be -registered as voters of said county.

Thus is raised by the petition the right of the said. R. F. Ashley to register the said Burrell Bowlin and others, after January 5, 1916, in, to-wit, the month of March, 1916; and the right of [457] Burrell Bowlin and others, so registered or sought to be registered, by the said R. F. Ashley, in 1916, after January 5th, contrary to the express provisions of the act, to be registered and listed among the legal voters of said county.

The act of 1915, in question, made it tjje duty of the Governor, the state auditor, and the commissioner of agriculture and industries, or of a majority of them, acting as a board of appointment, to’ appoint a “reputable and suitable person” who should be a qualified elector and resident of the county and who should not hold an elective office during the time, to conduct in each county ■ the registration of the qualified voters therein, the term of such registrars to be for four years and until their successors are appointed.

By sections 3 and 31% of the act it is provided as follows: “Sec. 3. Vacancies of Registrars; How Filled. — If one or more of the persons appointed on such board of registration shall refuse, neglect, or be unable to qualify or serve, or if. a vacancy or vacancies occur in the membership of the registrar from any cause, the Governor, state auditor and commissioner of agriculture and industries, or a majority of them acting, as a board of appointment, shall make other appointments to fill such board.”

“Sec. 31%. That in case of sickness or other disability of the registrar, the registrar on the approval of the probate judge may appoint a deputy registrar to act in the place of the registrar pending his sickness or disability, provided, however, that in no case shall more than one salary be paid.”

Thus there was made in the statute ample provision for timely appointment, to meet any failure in the office of registrar because of the refusal, neglect, or inability, of the registrar “to qualify or serve;” and thus it was provided for the registration, within the time prescribed, of those qualified under the act to be registered.

Section 31 of the act reads as follows: “Sec. 31. The registrar shall, each year, within two weeks after January 15, make a copy of the list of names registered, stating the residence of the persons registered by precincts, and where precincts have been subdivided into districts by districts or precincts, which copy, along with the registration lists must be returned to the office of the probate judge of the county. The judge of probate shall certify an alphabetical list to the secretary of state. The probate judge shall keep both the original list filed by the regis[458] trars and the alphabetical list made therefrom as records in the office of the probate judge of the county, and same shall be open to public inspection.”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. Newton v. Herring, 71 So. 679, 196 Ala. 455, 1916 Ala. LEXIS 389 (Ala. 1916).

71 So. 679 (State ex rel. Newton v. Herring) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State Ex Rel. Harrington v. Randle
35 So. 2d 84 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1948)
Madison v. Nunnelee
20 So. 2d 589 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1945)