State ex rel. Newsome v. Brogan

Ohio Supreme Court

State ex rel. Newsome v. Brogan

859 N.E.2d 555, 112 Ohio St. 3d 1415

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedDecember 27, 2006

Docket2006-1965

StatusPublished

This text of 859 N.E.2d 555 (State ex rel. Newsome v. Brogan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Newsome v. Brogan, 859 N.E.2d 555, 112 Ohio St. 3d 1415 (Ohio 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

In Mandamus and Prohibition. On relator’s motion to incorporate court of appeals case as evidence, motion to accept stricken complaint as evidence, motion to accept court of appeals pleading as evidence, motion to accept pleadings as evidence for disciplinary action, motion to accept affidavits, motion for the court for disciplinary evidence, and motion to the court as further evidence for disciplinary action, and respondents’ motion to dismiss and motion to strike motion to incorporate court of appeals ease as evidence and to accept stricken complaint as evidence. Motion to dismiss granted. All other motions denied as moot. Cause dismissed.

Moyer, C.J., Resnick, Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell and Lanzinger, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Mandamus and Prohibition. On relator’s motion to incorporate court of appeals case as evidence, motion to accept stricken complaint as evidence, motion to accept court of appeals pleading as evidence, motion to accept pleadings as evidence for disciplinary action, motion to accept affidavits, motion for the court for disciplinary evidence, and motion to the court as further evidence for disciplinary action, and respondents’ motion to dismiss and motion to strike motion to incorporate court of appeals ease as evidence and to accept stricken complaint as evidence. Motion to dismiss granted. All other motions denied as moot. Cause dismissed.

Moyer, C.J., Resnick, Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell and Lanzinger, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

859 N.E.2d 555, 112 Ohio St. 3d 1415, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-newsome-v-brogan-ohio-2006.